‹foote=
r›
‹#R=
50;
‹date/time›
------=_NextPart_01C53120.83572C90
Content-Location: file:///C:/EA8B2234/MannyFernandezPresent_files/master05.xml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Thi=
s is
Chairman of the Board Manny Fernandez’s
presentation to the
Faculty Senate on March 17
2005.
The posit=
ive
feedback from the Faculty Senators prodded
=
;
me to ask Manny to share it with a wider audience. =
;
=
;
He kindly agreed, although with some trepidation,
=
;
as it is still a document in progress=
.
=
;
The many numbers below should not be taken at face value.
They appear for illustrative purpo=
ses.
Also, bear in mind that, never
intended to be a stand alone document,
it serves only as one facet of his
verbal presentation.
=
; &n=
bsp; =
; &n=
bsp; =
;
Pierre Ramond
Taking UF to a N=
ew
Level
-- a board perspective --
-- a board perspective --
March, 2005
Key Parameters “Pr=
esent
State”
![](3D"slide0009_image004.gif")
2003-04
Key Parameters “Pr=
esent
State”
2003-04
Key Gap Analysis=
(UF / #10 /
avg. top 10)
(Expected Gap =3D 2003 #10 Public @5% CGR vs. 200= 4 UF)
(Expected Gap =3D 2003 #10 Public @5% CGR vs. 200= 4 UF)
•Research (359 / 412 / 532)&=
#13;
–Expected
Gap by 2014 --- $300mm per year
•Post Docs Appointments (510=
/
554 / 728)
–Expected
Gap of 100 additional appointments
•Freshmen from top 10% of
class(75 / 87 / 95)
–Must
move to 90% level
•–<=
/span>Expected Gap of at least 40 new
members
•–<=
/span>Expected Gap of at least 500 new
professors
•Peer Perception (3.6 / 4.0 /
4.6)
–Must
move above 4.0
•Endowment (583 / 1098 / 1765)
–Expected
Gap of over $1B
•
–
<=
/span>
![](3D"slide0016_image007.gif")
![](3D"slide0016_image008.gif")
![](3D"slide0016_image009.gif")
2003-04
![](3D"slide0010_image010.gif")
Students
Facilities
![](3D"slide0010_image011.gif")
External
Affairs
![](3D"slide0010_image012.gif")
Faculty
![](3D"slide0010_image013.gif")
Research
Endowment
Donors
Federal
Research
Grad
School
=
Class Size
Faculty/Student Ratio
Academy Members
Diversity
Salary and Benefits
Peer Perception
In State Reach
Tallahassee Relations
Federal / DC Relations
World Perception
Peer Perception
![](3D"slide0010_image014.gif")
Graduate School Size
Exposure
Faculty Size
Size of Endowment
Alumni Participation
Limited State Support
Lack of Devolution
2003-04
Strategic Imperatives
![3D"Radial](3D"slide0002_image015.gif")
Financial
Aid
External
Relations
Capital
Campaign
Devolution
Graduate
Edu=
cation
Faculty
Enhance.
Action
Items
Faculty Enhancement
![3D"Radial](3D"slide0006_image016.gif")
Shared
Governance
Graduate
Education
National
Academy
Additional
Faculty
Faculty
Salary/
Benefits
Faculty
Enhancement
Devolution
![](3D"slide0015_image017.gif")
Capital
Campaign
![](3D"slide0015_image018.gif")
Faculty
Salary &
Benefits
![](3D"slide0015_image019.gif")
Additional
Faculty
![](3D"slide0015_image020.gif")
Financial
Aid
![](3D"slide0015_image021.gif")
Graduate
Aid
![](3D"slide0015_image022.gif")
Academy
Members
![](3D"slide0015_image023.gif")
Facility
Expansion
Strategic
Items
![](3D"slide0015_image024.gif")
Strategic
Initiatives
![](3D"slide0015_image025.gif")
Student
Services
Priorities
•Faculty Salary and Benefits program
•Add National Academy members
•Hire new professors
•Improve Graduate Education
<=
span
class=3DBB style=3D'position:absolute;left:-4.47%;top:-.15em'>•Create new Finan=
cial
Aid program
<=
span
style=3D'visibility:hidden'>•
![](3D"slide0018_image026.gif")
Faculty Salary & Benefits=
30th 50th 60th
National Academy 2-4 5-8 <=
/span>9-12
Faculty Additions 50 100 150 200 250
F=
inancial
Aid(%) 20 40 60 80 100
G=
raduate
Education(%) 21 22 24 2=
6 28
Priorities
t
Summary
•Board and Administration are fully aligned&#=
13;
•Starts with Devolution
•How do mobilize =
all of
our resources?
•Capital Campaign becomes pivotal
=
<=
span
style=3D'visibility:hidden'>•
<=
span
class=3DBB style=3D'position:absolute;left:-4.47%;top:-.15em'>•Legislative sess=
ion is
critical
<=
span
style=3D'visibility:hidden'>•
![3D"Taking](3D"slide0020_image027.gif")
‹header›
‹date/time›=
Click to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
‹footer›
‹#›
Th=
is chart
is the backbone of the presentation and has a significant amount of information.
Yo=
u should
take your time to review this data.
We=
have
taken all of the critical parameters the first 2 columns compares UF with =
the top private institution in the country, and the av=
erage
top 10 private institution. =
We then, turned our attention to public institution a=
nd
compared us to the #1, average top 10=
, and
finally to the public university in the 10th posi=
tion, as
the institution we must displace to a=
chieve
our goal.
In=
the
next slide we begin to look at this data in more detail. But, you may want to come back to this slide to compare UF with others&=
#13;
We=
have
color coded the chart to make it easier to focus the discussion. Green shaded areas are parameters we are already in the top 10 of public
institutions, yellow cells are those =
we are
within a few percentage points or in the top 20. The red parameters are the ones we are significantly behind against our
competition
Le=
t’s
examine UF versus the publics in the next alide
' + ENDSHOW_MESG + '